AI visibility for cannabis dispensaries

No. Both prohibit cannabis advertising and we will not try to work around a platform policy on your account — the downside is your account, not ours. That prohibition is the reason this work matters: the channels your competitors in other industries lean on are closed to all of you equally, so organic and AI visibility is where the category is actually decided.

Weedmaps ads rent you position inside Weedmaps for as long as you keep paying. This builds presence across the sources every engine reads, including Weedmaps, and it keeps working when you pause. The two are complementary, but only one of them is an asset you own.

For local queries, generally yes — "dispensary near me" and "best dispensary in [city]" return named businesses. Product and dosing questions often get declined. Coverage is patchier than in aesthetics or dental, so the baseline measures which of your prompts return a list at all before it measures whether you are on it. If the answer for your market is that engines mostly decline, we will tell you that rather than sell you a programme.

Usually yes, because the competitive set in a single market is small and the entry engagement is a fixed-price project rather than a retainer. If the measurement shows you are already named consistently, we will say so and stop there.

Each location is measured separately, because engines resolve them separately, and cannabis marketing cannot cross state lines. Multi-state operators usually have strong brand recognition and individual locations that engines fail to resolve as distinct entities — which is a fixable entity problem rather than a content one.

Nothing we do involves health claims, untargeted advertising, or anything aimed at under-21s. We work inside your state's advertising rules and the platform rules on top of them, and we will flag it when a tactic that is fine in one market is not allowed in yours. We are not compliance counsel and we will not pretend to be.

Directory claims and structured data can register within two to four weeks. Review velocity and third-party presence compound over three to six months. We report monthly either way, so you see progress before it is complete.

No, and you should be sceptical of anyone who does. No AI platform publishes how it selects sources. We work from measured output and correlations documented across the industry, we report honestly, and we re-baseline the source map quarterly because these systems change fast.

No. The monthly plans are cancel any time and the entry engagement is a one-time project with a fixed price. We would rather earn the next month than hold you to a contract. One caveat worth stating plainly: review velocity and third-party coverage compound over three to six months, so leaving at month two means paying for work you never saw finish.